This article discusses the negative aspects of Deadspin, including the gratuitous posts, lack of diversity, and sexism. If you’re wondering why women are hesitant to read Deadspin, you’re not alone. This site is not a safe place for sensitive topics and many of its users engage in inappropriate behavior. You’ll find everything from naked pics to explicit posts. Then you can decide whether Deadspin is right for you.
Deadspin’s gratuitous posts
Deadspin has been in content mill mode for nearly four months. Founder Andrew Friedman alluded to this fact during an interview. The Forbes/Maven model relies on higher volume, SEO-rich content and memorable brand. The result is a website that is both cheap to produce and widely read. That’s the problem. And now, we have an issue: How will they handle this? Let’s take a look at the back story.
While the majority of Deadspin’s content is extremely opinionated, there is still an underlying ethos of objectivity. The site was founded by a writer who understood the importance of criticism. Deadspin was infamous for debating sports media figures, such as Sean Salisbury and ESPN. Its staff routinely secured stories, and some even had the audacity to trade Brett Favre pictures for cash.
Andrews was not an unlikely target for the site. Deadspin’s first readers came by accident. It took a certain set of skills to run the site. But each day, it became a better version of itself. Despite this setback, Andrews managed to keep the site’s tradition of gratuitous posts. Its readers appreciated this, and it’s an indication that Deadspin’s new owners are doing something right.
Amid this, the NFL is trying to get back at Deadspin over its content. Twitter suspended its account on Monday and blocked the site’s tweets containing GIF clips of NFL games. Both the NFL and Deadspin have denied the charges. However, Twitter’s suspension didn’t stop Deadspin from releasing the content – and the NFL’s DMCA takedown notices have only served to show how apathetic their followers are toward their ad-funded sports media.
Its lack of diversity
Originally, Deadspin was a place for guys to take on the sports establishment, but with the company’s recent transformation, it’s now a website that fights for more inclusive sports journalism. But some are questioning whether this latest version of the sports website is righteous, while others are wondering if it’s actually breaking the law. In the end, it’s hard to say, but the company is weighing its options with a sale to parent company Univision.
In 2011, Deadspin was challenged by Blogs with Balls 4 over its lack of diversity. Then in 2013, it named Emma Carmichael as its managing editor, and its content has since become an embarrassment. But this new editor, Diana Moskovitz, has also written several articles on domestic violence and other controversial issues, so perhaps this will be the final straw. Deadspin has made an effort to improve diversity in its staff.
Deadspin’s lack of diversity isn’t limited to its content. The website will always have funny posts with profane and a lack of diversity, but there’s room for growth in the future. Greenwell wants to expand Deadspin’s coverage beyond sports and into business and sneaker culture. For example, it’s a longtime fan favorite of Draymond Green, but he recently commented on the situation in his Fox Sports Radio show, The Odd Couple.
The New Yorker is another example of a media publication that values diversity: it hires people of color, black people, women, and even people from rural West Virginia. And yet the magazine’s staff is mostly white. Its diversity report also shows that “people of color” make up 28% of the editorial staff. A few black journalists make up the remaining 5%. So far, no one from the “elite” media is writing for Deadspin.
Its hipster jock-boy culture
It is easy to see how Andrews became a target for deadspin’s snarky posts about the new sex. The site published dozens of posts about Andrews, often with sarcastic asides about her breasts or her lack of talent. They often included pictures of Andrews eating a hoagie. Deadspin’s approach to the “hipster jock-boy” culture is predictable and unoriginal.
In addition to the “hipster” sexism, Deadspin is also known as a haven for sexist, homophobic and racist behavior. Although many people use Deadspin as a way to share their views, the culture behind it is based on sexism and homophobia. Many of the comments and threads are full of offensive and inaccurate comments about people of different ethnicities.
There is an extreme case of sexism on the site Deadspin. The site has become popular among jock-boys and hipsters, and the content on this site is generally destructive. Users claim to be pointing out the shitty behavior of others, but they’re actually engaging in aggressive sexism, racism, and homophobia. Let’s examine some of these instances.
Among other sexism-related posts, Deadspin published a lot of gratuitous posts involving Ashley Andrews, including sarcastic comments about her breasts, insufficient talent, and stupid puns about fucking her. Most of these posts also contained pictures of Andrews eating a hoagie. These were all essentially excuses to post photos of Andrews.